Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is much better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, having an 87.7 score against 76.3. The Galaxy M51 is a notably newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it's noticeably heavier and a lot thicker. Galaxy M51 features a screen that is just as good as Motorola Moto Z3 Play's screen, because although the Galaxy M51 has a quite lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M51, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy M51 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.