Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Moto Z3 Play, with a 90.8 score against 76.3. Galaxy Note 20 is a way newer phone than Moto Z3 Play, but it's thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Moto Z3 Play features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.