Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is way better than the Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a notably newer phone than Moto Z3 Play, but it's thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little greater pixels amount per inch in the screen, a bigger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a way higher video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.