Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is notably older, thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better processor than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much better screen than Moto Z3 Play, although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note 3's camera is very similar to Moto Z3 Play's camera, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has a smaller camera sensor offering a worse image quality and a much smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a higher 13 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.