Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it is somewhat thicker and just a little heavier. Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2280. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 0.39 inches sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has higher video frame rates and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Note10 costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.