Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than Moto Z3 Play, with a score of 86.2 against 76.3. The Galaxy Note10 Lite design is newer than Moto Z3 Play's, but it's heavier and notably thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit lower pixels count per display inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 Lite takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a same size sensor, the same resolution back-facing camera, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.