Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-06-29 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a bit better than Moto Z3 Play, having a overall score of 77.6 against 76.3. Although it's the best we compare here, we must tell that it is also much older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Note4 has a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher screen pixel density. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note4 features a bit better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 7% greater battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in poorly lited situations and a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.