Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Samsung Galaxy S10's construction is thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Galaxy S10 has a brighter display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better count of pixels per display inch.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same (4K) video quality and a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S10 also has a bigger diafragm aperture and better video frame rates. Galaxy S10 features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.