Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting a global score of 89.7 against 76.3. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is newer, but heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite inferior pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way more MP camera in the back, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.