Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is thicker but a little bit lighter than Moto Z3 Play, and both were released with only a few months difference. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little bit better display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2280 resolution.
Moto Z3 Play has a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e has a little better battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy S10e features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger aperture and better video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.