Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Moto Z3 Play, having a 90.8 score against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a a lot newer cellphone than the Moto Z3 Play, but it is heavier and thicker. The Galaxy S20 FE has a little better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little greater screen pixel density and a quite larger display. Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition and a 12 megapixels camera in the back, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a bit more expensive than the Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.