Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 score. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer phone than the Moto Z3 Play, although it's much thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a larger screen, more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a lot better video resolution and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.