Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, having an 89.1 score against 76.3. Although Galaxy S21 FE is much newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy S21 FE has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a quite larger screen, a little better pixel count per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit better processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has more RAM memory. Moto Z3 Play features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features a really longer battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S21 FE is more expensive than the Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.