Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a noticeably newer cellphone than Moto Z3 Play, but it is a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite higher display density and a bit bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has greater battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a much better video quality and a much more MP camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.