Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is way better than Moto Z3 Play's score of 76.3. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much newer cellphone than Moto Z3 Play, but it is way heavier and notably thicker. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit better pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bit larger screen. The Moto Z3 Play has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.