Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 general score. Galaxy S25's design is notably lighter and a lot thinner than Moto Z3 Play. The Moto Z3 Play counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy S25 features an incredibly better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a bit larger display and a little bit better screen pixel density. The Moto Z3 Play counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S25 features greater battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S25 features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos, a way higher video definition and a way better 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 costs a lot more money than Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.