Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than the Moto Z3 Play's general score of 76.3. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lighter and notably thinner phone than the Moto Z3 Play. Moto Z3 Play has a lot better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit better screen density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit bigger screen. Moto Z3 Play features more storage for applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.