Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
64 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 85.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminium and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with a global score of 85.1 against 76.3. The Samsung Galaxy S6 construction has the same thickness than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it is lighter. Galaxy S6 counts with a better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 has a much more vibrant screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Galaxy S6 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video and a smaller back camera sensor shooting lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Moto Z3 Play has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has just a little better battery life than Galaxy S6, because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.