Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a general score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy S7 edge body is incredibly older, a bit heavier and a little thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Galaxy S7 edge features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it has lesser cores (although they are faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto Z3 Play counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge also has a bigger camera sensor.
The Galaxy S7 edge features better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S7 edge not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.