Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, although it's way thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a brighter display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better CPU than Moto Z3 Play. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z3 Play. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z3 Play, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.