Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is better than Moto Z3 Play's score of 76.3. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction has the same thickness than Moto Z3 Play, but it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little larger display.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory. The Moto Z3 Play features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Moto Z3 Play also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
The Moto Z3 Play has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.