Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 overall score. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot heavier than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's just a little thinner and notably newer. Moto Z3 Play and Galaxy Z Fold 3 have extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a bigger display.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. Moto Z3 Play takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels back camera, the Moto Z3 Play also has a much larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.