Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than the Moto Z3 Play, getting a 91.1 score against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is somewhat thinner but notably heavier than Moto Z3 Play. Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a way better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels and a way larger display. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z3 Play. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z3 Play, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.