Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with a overall score of 94.3 against 76.3. Even though Xperia PRO is newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's a lot thicker and extremely heavier. Xperia PRO counts with a better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a way better screen pixels density, a way higher 1644 x 3840 pixels resolution and a little bit larger display.
Xperia PRO has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia PRO also has more RAM memory. The Xperia PRO features a slightly better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same resolution camera and a F1.7 aperture, the Xperia PRO also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Xperia PRO features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Xperia PRO has longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z3 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Xperia PRO, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto Z3 Play, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.