Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has a general score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 score. The Xperia Z4v design is noticeably older, a little bit heavier and a lot thicker than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Sony Xperia Z4v has a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Xperia Z4v counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Moto Z3 Play has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Sony Xperia Z4v shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera and a larger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Xperia Z4v counts with a battery lifetime that is very similar to Moto Z3 Play's battery performance.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xperia Z4v is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.