Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's general score of 76.3. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is newer than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's noticeably heavier and way thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a just a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, a larger screen and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has more memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.