Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with an 87.9 score against 76.3. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it is a lot thicker and notably heavier. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more mega pixels camera.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.