Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a score of 86.1, which is much better than the Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. Despite being the best in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a thicker and much heavier device than the Moto Z3 Play. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit higher display density, a lot higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.