Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it is much thicker and extremely heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a screen that is just as good as Motorola Moto Z3 Play's display, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 Play also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.