Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has a score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. IPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z3 works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. The iPhone 11 design is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z3. Apple iPhone 11 features a quite superior hardware performance than Moto Z3, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 11 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a way lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a just a little lower number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger display. Motorola Moto Z3 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 11, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 11 has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3110mAh battery capacity. The Apple iPhone 11 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back, the Apple iPhone 11 also has a larger aperture, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z3. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto Z3, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.