Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. Although the Apple iPhone 12 Pro is incredibly newer than Moto Z3, it's heavier and a little thicker. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Moto Z3 counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a higher amount of RAM.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen, a slightly better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit larger screen. Moto Z3 features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone 12 Pro features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same video resolution, the iPhone 12 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Moto Z3 has a bit better battery life than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone 12 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto Z3, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.