Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is much better than Moto Z3, with a score of 93.3 against 77.6. IPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Even though the iPhone 13 Pro is way newer than Moto Z3, it is notably heavier and just a little bit thicker. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little larger display, a bit better count of pixels in each inch of display and a bit higher 1170 x 2532px resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a greater hardware performance than Moto Z3, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels and the same (4K) video quality, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also has a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments and faster video frame rates.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3095mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z3, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.