Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is way better than Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z3 counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's body is newer than Moto Z3's, although it's just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a greater amount of RAM. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a better 1284 x 2778 resolution, a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a much better storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a little bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has better video frame rate and a way larger aperture.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z3, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.