Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 7 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Moto Z3's general score of 77.6. IPhone 7's construction is lighter than Moto Z3, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released just a little further than a year before. The iPhone 7 and Motorola Moto Z3 feature extremely similar screens, although the iPhone 7 has a bit lower pixels quantity per inch in the display, a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334 and a much smaller display.
The Moto Z3 features a bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 7, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z3 has a bit faster processor than Apple iPhone 7, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a way better battery duration than iPhone 7, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1960mAh. The Apple iPhone 7 captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone 7 also counts with a bigger aperture.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 7, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z3, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.