Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Moto Z3, having a general score of 88.1 against 77.6. Although Apple iPhone X is a better cellphone than Moto Z3, we must highlight that it's also an older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone. The iPhone X has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone X has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little better display pixels density. IPhone X takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z3, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the iPhone X also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture.
Moto Z3 counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z3. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z3, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.