Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Moto Z3, getting an 81.9 score against 77.6. Even though Google Pixel 4 is newer than the Moto Z3, it is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little better pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos and a back camera with a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution.
Moto Z3 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% bigger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 costs a bit more than the Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.