Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Moto Z3, with an 82.9 score against 77.6. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is newer than Moto Z3's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little better performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger sensor taking higher quality photographs, a bigger aperture and a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z3. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Moto Z3, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.