Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z3, it is somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Moto Z3 and the Google Pixel 4a 5G count with really similar processing units, and although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Moto Z3 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features improved battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.