Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-08-16 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than Moto Z3, getting a general score of 81 against 77.6. The LG G7 ThinQ is better than Moto Z3, we must note that it's also a somewhat thicker and just a little heavier cellphone. Both of these phones use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so both of them should offer identical operating system features.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Moto Z3, because it has a better pixels density, a little bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z3. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 16 mega-pixels resolution, faster 60 fps video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Motorola Moto Z3, they have equal internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ and Motorola Moto Z3 both count with really similar batteries duration.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.