Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a score of 77.6, which is slightly better than LG K52's global score of 76. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Moto Z3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and LG K52 has Android 10. Moto Z3 is an noticeably older cellphone than the LG K52, but it is somewhat lighter and thinner anyway.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with just a little better processing power than LG K52. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a much better display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display.
LG K52's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z3 one, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal memory. LG K52 takes clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the LG K52 also has a larger aperture, a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
The LG K52 counts with longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.