Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than Motorola Moto Z3, with an 85.4 score against 77.6. Even though LG K92 is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z3, it is thicker and much heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG K92 has older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Moto Z3 counts with a bit better processor than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a slightly better screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display. LG K92 has a greater storage for games and applications than Moto Z3, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal storage.
The LG K92 has better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. LG K92 captures much better pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG K92 also has a camera with way more mega pixels, a larger camera aperture and a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
LG K92 is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.