Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3, getting a 77.9 score against 77.6. The LG Q70 is a newer phone than Motorola Moto Z3, but it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Q70 has older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a little more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. LG Q70's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z3 one, they have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z3 features a bit more powerful CPU than LG Q70. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The LG Q70 has superior battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The LG Q70 has a better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG Q70 also has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos, a way better resolution camera in the back and a larger camera aperture.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z3. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto Z3, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.