Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 is a little bit better than the LG Stylo 6, getting a score of 77.6 against 76.7. The Motorola Moto Z3 body is extremely thinner and notably lighter than the LG Stylo 6, even though it was released about a year before. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Motorola Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
LG Stylo 6 and Moto Z3 feature really similar displays, because although the LG Stylo 6 has a just a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a bit bigger screen. The LG Stylo 6 has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Moto Z3, they have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z3 counts with a little faster processor than LG Stylo 6. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The LG Stylo 6 counts with greater battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto Z3 takes clearer photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back camera with less mega pixels and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs more money than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Moto Z3, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.