Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has an overall score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 score. Even being the best we compare here, we must highlight that it is also a incredibly older, heavier and thicker phone. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the LG V10 has older 5.1 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG V10 has a more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch. The Moto Z3 features a faster CPU than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto Z3 also has a greater number of faster cores.
The LG V10 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V10 also has higher video frame rate, a much more mega-pixels camera, a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The LG V10 and Motorola Moto Z3 feature extremely similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V10 and Moto Z3 both feature similar batteries performance.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, LG V10 is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.