Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Moto Z3, getting a score of 81.3 against 77.6. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than Moto Z3. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z3, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher pixel density.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z3 one, they have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a camera with lot more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.