Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than the Moto Z3, getting an 81.2 score against 77.6. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is a just a little bit heavier and a little thicker phone than the Moto Z3. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a higher pixel density and a little larger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ and Moto Z3 have incredibly similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a way bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a bigger back camera sensor and higher video frame rates.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.