Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3, having a general score of 87.6 against 77.6. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG V60 ThinQ body is newer than Motorola Moto Z3's, although it's notably thicker and way heavier.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in Moto Z3, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, because it has a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more megapixels back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ costs a little more than Motorola Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.