Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. LG Velvet's construction is newer than Moto Z3's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. LG Velvet has a processor that's very similar to the Motorola Moto Z3 one, and although the LG Velvet has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG Velvet and Motorola Moto Z3 have really similar screens, because although the LG Velvet has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a quite larger screen. LG Velvet shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG Velvet has more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto Z3, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage. LG Velvet counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG Velvet is also cheaper than the Moto Z3, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.