Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is much better than Moto Z3's 77.6 score. The LG Wing is a noticeably newer cellphone than Moto Z3, although it is incredibly heavier and much thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG Wing has the older 10 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG Wing has just a bit better processing power than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG Wing and Moto Z3 both feature similar screens, because although the LG Wing has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Wing takes greater videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video definition, the LG Wing also has a bigger aperture, better video frame rate, a way more megapixels back camera and a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos. The LG Wing has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 192 GB more internal memory.
LG Wing counts with greater battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z3. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z3, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.