Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Motorola Moto Z3, having a overall score of 87.1 against 77.6. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is way newer than Motorola Moto Z3's, but it's incredibly heavier and extremely thicker. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Moto Z3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto Z3 features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a really longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.